Caught Abusing A Crippled Child, Explains “He DESERVED IT!”

For those who don’t know what a “troll” is, this is your textbook example. Note that he’s reponding to “Just A Question” from 10-10, which asks the simple question “

Just A Thought

(10-10-2007)
I wonder why it is that so many who sputtered with righteous indignation about their perception of a slight to General Petraeus’ character in the MoveOn ad …

… are the same people attacking a 12-year-old child over the State Children’s Health Insurance Program and saying that he’s “fair game”?

It is a puzzlement.

Courage.

That’s it. Total. But, thinking that I wouldn’t track his email back to his blog, ‘Director’ fakes civility with this classic bit of trollery. But it’s part and parcel of the “Kill the messenger” approach that demonizes children over health care, soldiers over VA conditions, and Al Gore over global warming. The “good Germans” as Frank Rich bravely writes in this morning’s NY Times. (Warning, my response is not for the faint of heart, so bug out now, if “naughty” words offend thee, Gentle Reader):

directorblue
October 14th, 2007 at 8:20 am

Is it fair to question “http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/12/question-for-grown-ups” why the Frosts have a $50,000 vehicle, a $40,000 vehicle, and a $30,000 vehicle?

As an aside, I believe Graeme Frost has been treated by all with sympathy.

It’s the parents’ odd choices — combined with their ownership of multiple properties and expensive vehicles — that most have questioned.

The Frosts are an odd family indeed to hold up as the examplar for SCHIP.

Mr. Williams responds:

Fuck you, troll.

Having lost the debate on the particulars (i.e., was the Frost family eligible for SCHIP assistance? YES. WHY do you think he was the “poster child”? Random pick? Dumbass.), Michelle Malkin, the Kewpie Doll From Hell™, proceeds to put up photos of the vehicles in question (BRAND NEW ’showroom’ pictures, which no car ever looks like new, let alone used), THEN comes up with this horseshit, which you mindlessly repeat, and use to grafitti MY blog with? (I’ve removed your link, but retained the reference so that folks can find the source of your attempted propaganda disbursal.)

You have no debating point.

BTW: Who gives a fuck WHAT you “believe”? (You probably believe that Adam and Eve rode dinosaurs to church.) The idea that some brainless prick like you is so fucked up in the head about making an ass of himself in picking on a severly injured 12-year-old kid — and THEN is so far up his own ass that he has to travel around the ‘net repeating what Malkin gushes out of her orifices — pretty much says it all. You and your ilk made a huge mistake, and rather than admit defeat, you pretend civility and try to come up with another bullshit “debating” point to muddy the waters.

No: You’re a brainless sadist who gets off on abusing crippled children. That’s the bottom line, and why my response isn’t couched in any “polite” terms. You deserve my boot up your ass, minimally, and no courtesy whatsoever, Monster.

You are not-very-cordially invited to view the subsequent postings — which you’ve conveniently and tellingly ignored, “Lost In A Sea Of Hate” and “The Worst Thing I Could Say” — the latter of which has a nice picture of your goddess, Malkin, that you can masturbate to.

Why didn’t I spike your little ‘turd in the punchbowl’ comment?

Because I wanted my readers to see your “How To Be A Monster And Get Away With It 101″ technique.

First, you do something monstrous: attack a 12-year old, severely injured child (without ever stating your true agenda, which was, if his parents couldn’t afford medical attention he should have DIED), rather than debating the merits of SCHIP.

THEN, when caught being a loathsome asshole, a nazi-like monster, a crypto-Spartan “Put them on the hill to DIE” fuckwit, you PRETEND to be reasonable, and suddenly civil, and EXPECT progressives to buy your line of shit.

I have to hand it to you. Some moron pulled the ‘weepy conservative’ crap on a blog I cross-post at, and a resident brain-dead twit APOLOGIZED to him for his having been “censored.” Sometimes, you manage to pull this con off, which is, I suppose, why you repeat it.

But, really, FUCK YOU. There has been no civility in this debate from your side for a long time, and whenever you’d like to jump the fence back into Realityland, I’ll be there with a lei to garland you with flowers. In a democracy, reasoned disagreement is a necessity. In your dream of a fascist state, whatever will “catapult the propaganda” is the point: whether monstrous, like attacking a helpless child, or “civil” in pretending that the child DESERVED to be attacked, you are the problem, not the solution.

Now, go away, or I shall taunt you a second time.

Now, if you wonder at my lack of “civility,” take a look at “director’s” blog, and ask yourself WHO is civil and who is UNcivil? Really, this “all star wrestling” crap has to stop taking the place of real debate. The question as to whether to expand SCHIP (State Children’s Health Insurance Program — a phrase that the wingnuts would DESPERATELY like to avoid using) has nothing to do with the poster child’s family, which was brought up to SHOW what “SCHIP” actually was, and which I firmly believe was swift-boated in the blogosphere on direct orders from a White House already admittedly conferencing* with rightie bloggers on defending the US Attorneys firings, and getting out the Administration’s talking points on the Iraq Occupation.

[* As I've covered at length for some months now.]

Courage.

«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»

Cross-posted to some or all of these blogs: His Vorpal Sword, The Democratic Daily, The Commonwealth of Blogistan, The Katrinacrat

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized