While MSNBC seems to be noticing that there are some REALLY creepy things being slipped by them — Politico reporting that the Pat Buchanan’s ‘Hitler’ column is being removed from its website — there’s more (and WORSE) that they’re still missing ….
Independent Women’s Forum President and CEO
Michelle Bernard as an MSNBC “Political Analyst”
Certainly they’re dominating the “health care” debate via their astroturf groups. Case in point is that the two main groups opposing health care reform were, ten years ago:
- Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation (became Americans for Prosperity),
- Citizens for a Sound Economy (became FreedomWorks)
Now, another astroturf group has weighed in, a subsidiary of the aforementioned, which Rachel Maddow mentioned Tuesday on Maddow’s MSNBC Show.
- Independent Women’s Forum
What’s strange is that nobody at MSNBC noticed that the HEAD of the Independent Women’s Forum (a Koch Brothers astroturf group) is an MSNBC Political Analyst, and she’s on Chris Matthews ALL THE FREAKING TIME! Here she is:
And here’s what the IWF paid her as a Konservative Spokesmodel in 2007:
(They paid her $170,000 in 2006.)
And here is what Maddow said about her IWF astroturf group Tuesday:
‘The Rachel Maddow Show’ for Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Read the transcript to the Tuesday show
updated 6:54 a.m. PT, Wed., Sept . 2, 2009
Guests: Tom Ridge, Terry O‘Neill
MADDOW: [...] See, health reform – it‘s a secret plot to kill hundreds of thousands of American women with breast cancer. That ad is being broadcast in a multimillion-dollar ad buy in eight states. It was done by a conservative group called the Independent Women‘s Forum. We called them for comment today. We‘re still waiting for their response.
And as reported by Michelle Goldberg today at the “Daily Beast,” the Independent Women‘s Forum has also sent out a fundraising E-mail covering the same scare tactics territory. The E-mail has the subtle subject line, quote, “More American women are going to die.”
After that, bucket of “O, Fortuna” in the face, the letter begins, quote, “More American women are going to die of breast cancer if you and I surrender to President Obama‘s nationalized healthcare onslaught. Real people might not make it if President Obama inflicts his nationalized health care on America.”
So be afraid, women with breast cancer. Health reform is a secret plot to kill you. Pay no attention to the fact that every major breast cancer advocacy group in the country supports the healthcare reform. The Independent Women‘s Forum wants you to be afraid and also send them a check.
Although you might want to hold off on that. They’re getting a multi-year contract from the US State Department:
(Note, I’ve cut and pasted the tax return to save space
click to enlarge)
Funny thing here is that they subcontracted $91,400 of that to the American Islamic Congress in 07:
And, equally funny, out of their kitty, they paid $202, 304 in “non-taxable lobbying fees.” Ain’t that grand?
In 2006, $661,216 was received by the IWF from the US Government, and 1.3 million from donors.
Jeepers. Kind of strange that they’re so latched onto the Government’s teat, considering their mission statement [emphasis added]:
Our mission is to rebuild civil society by advancing economic liberty, personal responsibility, and political freedom. IWF builds support for a greater respect for limited government, equality under the law, property rights, free markets, strong families, and a powerful and effective national defense and foreign policy….
I guess they’re only against government handouts when somebody ELSE asks for them.
So, who are these people, who have so successfully infiltrated the mainstream media, and are suddenly running $2 million in ads attacking health care with bogus breast cancer scare tactics?
According to the Women’s Legal Defense and Education Fund:
Originally formed in 1991 as “Women for Clarence Thomas” in an effort to secure the nominee a seat on the Supreme Court. Just what the Independent Women’s Forum is independent from is unclear — it certainly cannot claim independence from the White House with Vice-Presidential wife Lynne Cheney as Director Emeritus and ultra-conservative pundit and Bush advisor Larry Kudlow as a board member. IWF has even been awarded a grant as part of the US Department of State’s $10 million Iraqi Women’s Democracy Initiative to help a group of Iraqi women leaders define their role in Iraq’s government.
It’s too bad that The Daily Beast‘s Michelle Goldberg didn’t bother getting any deeper than subcutaneous on this. This was the only statement in her Beastly Column that hinted at who these creeps are (the column that Rachel Maddow picked up on ):
The Latest Health Care Lie
by Michelle Goldberg
… The Independent Women’s Forum is closely linked to Americans for Prosperity, a major organizer of anti-Obama tea parties and town hall protests. (According to Sourcewatch.org, the two groups shared the same address and most of the same operations staff until last year). So the effort to link health-care reform to breast cancer death is coming from the same people who’ve previously compared health care reform to the Holocaust. The new tack sounds slightly more reasonable, and it’s developing legs….
Maybe she could have taken more than a nanosecond on her Google search to find Nicole Bell on Crooks and Liars:
Crooks and Liars
Sunday February 1, 2009 12:00 pm
Hardball: Michelle Bernard Doesn’t Think Women Should Worry Their Pretty Little Heads About Pay Equality
By Nicole Belle
Where did Michelle Bernard come from, and why on earth would anyone ask her opinion on the Lilly Ledbetter Act, which President Obama signed into law last week?
The first question is easier to answer. Bernard is President of the deceptively-named Independent Women’s Forum, a thinktank that is neither “Independent” (Prominent members include Kate O’Beirne, Nancy Pfotenhauer, Lynne Cheney and the Podhoretz boys’ wife and mother, Midge Decter. Funding comes from organizations like the Castle Rock Foundation and the Scaife Foundation. Sound independent to you?) nor particularly interested in furthering the welfare of women. In fact, some of their declared stances are against gender equality, like Title IX and the Violence Against Women Act. A curious case of self-loathing that must be given an inordinate amount of airtime, don’t you think?
So, all that air time was wasted in NOT understanding that Americans for Prosperity, the Independent Women’s Forum, FreedomWorks, the Sam Adams Alliance and Americans for Limited Government (and others, including the new American Liberty Alliance, founded by Tea Party founder and former Sam Adams staffer Eric Odom) are ALL intimately tied to the Koch astroturf machine. These foundations breed faster than paramecia in a petrie dish of agar. But the same suspects show up over and over again.
Now, in future columns (although I’d really rather be working on my book) I’ll talk about the attempted takeover of the GOP by the hard-core crypto-Libertarians (who are the TRUE RINOs, having only infiltrated to subsume).
But, I learned something when I was tracking these people down in 2006…
You people are scared of columns more than 1,000 words, so I’ll break it up into bite-sized chunks.
Here’s the Independent Women’s Forum tax return for 2007 (.pdf) — for those of you who are actually interested.
UPDATE 1:46 PM PDT: Just received (h/t Bill Eagle emphasis added):
A False Appeal To Women’s Fears
Republican-leaning group claims health care legislation could lead to 300,000 deaths from breast cancer, but uses old statistics, faulty logic and false insinuations.
September 4, 2009
A conservative group with Republican ties called the Independent Women’s Forum is airing an ad that says “300,000 American women with breast cancer might have died” if our health care were “government run” like England’s, citing the American Cancer Society as a source for the figure. In fact, a spokesman for the cancer society’s advocacy arm says that figure is “not reliable” and adds: “[I]t’s not one that we have ever cited; it’s not one that we would ever cite.” Furthermore, an epidemiologist with the cancer society told us that the way this figure was calculated was “really faulty.”
Hmmm. Gee. Why does this not seem a great surprise?