Robert Stacy McCain / The Other McCain: Michelle Malkin: ‘Political correctness is the handmaiden of terror’
And Michelle Malkin is the handmaiden of Satan.
The problem is, who can figure out what Robert Stacy McCain is the handmaiden of?
The obvious answer, of course, is “shit.” But the image just doesn’t work. “Shit” with servants? Dubious metaphor.
Add this: being a former sportswriter, RSM probably doesn’t like being called a “maiden” of any kind.
And, technically, since a maiden is defined by an intact maidenhead, and RS McCain evinces no evidence of having any sort of “head” whatsoever, it would be wrong to call him a handmaiden. Let’s see, what else ought we to call him?
Got it:
Utterly reprehensible asswipe.
They show the glee of archdemons over the Fort Hood massacre. And that’s just beyond the pale of “human” behavior. Demonic? Certainly. Monstrous? Of course. Human or humane? Never.
The reflexive “We are going to call Obama any name that Bush was called” neatly avoids the questions of complicity and responsibility, just like these racist assholes avoid all questions raised by “facts.” And they’re masturbating with the blood of dead soldiers, friends. DON’T DOUBT THAT: They’re so HAPPY that this happened you’d think THEY planned it.
The racism and anti “Jihadist” stuff started five minutes after the shootings were sketchily announced on teevee. And watch for Dickie Boy Cheney to shoot his pathetic little wad this week, as well. Just sayin’.
And Michelle Malkin evidently had a “terror” orgasm so intense that she pissed all over herself.
Michelle Malkin: The massacre at Fort Hood and Muslim soldiers with attitude
Thus reporteth McCain, unable.
[Grilling two turds with one post.]
Courage.
10 Comments
7 November 2009 at 12:38 am
Hey, a year ago it was a Christian Soldier who killed 5 people. He snapped just like this guy. Everything was the same. Nothing on his religion at all.
People don’t want to be sent to those h*ll holes and they snap! Sad but true.
We need to get out of there.
Sorry about the mess we made of your country…
8 November 2009 at 12:35 pm
Yes. We need to get out of both countries yesterday. We made a fundamental error in our original assumptions, and ended up going after a criminal gang with an army, rather than with a dogged police force. You can’t end crime by conquering the country that the criminals might have come from or lived in.
You only commit a much larger war crime yourself. And guarantee that those invaded will harbor plansd for revenge for generations. How many INNOCENT Iraqis and Afghanistanis have we killed? That’s justice?
10 November 2009 at 2:45 am
If a State makes itself a party to an attack it had best be able to stand the gaff. Whatever point there may have been to Afghanistan evaporated with GWB doing it on the cheap and then turning his back on what he’d started.
He could have struck immediately and massively at AQ and seen if the Taliban govt would hold still for it. IF they hadn’t held still for it, there’d have been disasterous consequences for those on the ground. I don’t have convincing evidence either way, but their record of behavior sure isn’t reassuring. Police depend on a certain amount of tolerance for their activity. I suppose you could assure their possible opponents that if they interfered they’d be obliterated, that assumes they’d believe or care.
I sure don’t like the use of large blunt instruments for surgery, but scalpels also are pretty useless for driving nails.
10 November 2009 at 11:37 pm
Chuck: I know you think you said something profound, but really, you’re just bragging about the size of your gunbarrel.
Again.
Cut out the macho crap and try opposing the hate and bigotry. Jesus will thank you for it.
13 November 2009 at 2:12 am
I have never confused myself with a Christian.
What Christ had to say and what States will do hasn’t shown much congruence or promise of any. That I loath stupid exercises in force doesn’t mean I don’t understand force isn’t called for at times. That I’d prefer a world where that isn’t true doesn’t make the world something else.
There is no confusion in my mind that a car bomb and an F16 bomb are both bombs.
13 November 2009 at 2:32 am
You know, the fact that the US has a big gun doesn’t make the US right, but it does mean there is a big gun there. Along with that is the consideration that we frequently use it. A State that ignores that while in possesion of pea shooter has made a mistake. Oddly enough, lots of States want bigger guns. Seems to have been an ongoing thing for, oh, awhile/forever.
Snotty dismissal is fine, I do understand a fuckyou.
Been here before with you
Didn’t care for it then
Still don’t
13 November 2009 at 2:47 am
It took this long to sink in that you actually said that to me, you sanctimonious twit. I’m willing to admit that in no single post did I use as many words as you to make that point, but I’m less impressed with hanging a whole shitload of words together to make a point, I guess. I don’t have any use for Michner’s novels, either.
Have no fear, I’ll quit mucking around in your playpen.
17 November 2009 at 11:49 pm
“that you actually said that to me, you sanctimonious twit.”
Arrogance AND cluelessness, Chuck? That was the reason that I replied as I did in the first place. When I make a long post, and a comment denotes that you had not the LEAST idea what the posting was about, but want to strut your macho ANYWAY, well, don’t expect flowers and violins. Big boys play here, so if you are afraid of scuffing your knee, then you’ve made a wise decision in running away. Politeness gets a polite response. Arrant and clueless arrogance gets what you got. Now git.
17 November 2009 at 11:51 pm
You notice anything about your replies, Chuck?
They’re all nasty and increasingly belligerent. You’ve certainly made your point here about what a thoughtful and eloquent fellow you are. All wingnuts aren’t assholes. All liberals ain’t saints. I think you’ve proven that here today.
17 November 2009 at 11:52 pm
I’m sure no Christian would confuse you for one, either. Ditto “civilized” persons.