ACTUAL hirers of hookers
This is not going to come as any surprise to regular readers of this blog since a week ago:
Escort says Menendez prostitution claims were made up
By Carol D. Leonnig and Ernesto Londoño, Updated: Monday, March 4, 1:57 PM
Washington PostAn escort who appeared on a video claiming Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) paid her for sex has told Dominican Republic police that she was instead paid to make up the claims in a tape recording and has never met or seen the senator before, according to court documents and two people briefed on her claim.
The woman identified a lawyer who approached her and a friend to make the videotape, according to affidavits obtained by the Post. That man has in turn identified another lawyer who gave him a script for the tape and paid him to find women to fabricate the claims, the affidavits say…
Gasp! You mean that Tucker Carlson’s vicious little virtual rag, The Daily Caller, would MAKE UP stuff like this?
Does Foster Friess believe that an aspirin between the knees is efficacious birth control?*
(* After all, it’s Foster’s bucks that are paying for the hookers.)
The article goes on to say:
“It’s amazing to me that anonymous, nameless, faceless individuals on a Web site can drive that type of story into the mainstream, but that’s what they’ve done successfully,” Menendez said last month. “Now, nobody can find them. No one ever met them. No one ever talked to them, but that’s where we’re at. So the bottom line is all of those smears are absolutely false and, you know, that’s the bottom line.”
The women’s videotaped claims, with their faces obscured, were played on the conservative Web site The Daily Caller. The news site reported that “the two women said they met Menendez around Easter at Casa de Campo, an expensive 7,000-acre resort in the Dominican Republic…They claimed Menendez agreed to pay them $500 for sex acts, but in the end they each received only $100.”
But in an affidavit obtained Monday, one of the women on the tape, who describes herself as an escort, said she and a colleague were offered money by a lawyer to read from a script. The woman said she was surreptitiously videotaped implicating Menendez and Melgen.
Now, let’s see what “Mister Morals” Friess thinks of the character assassination website he funds paying good “Christian” money to Dominican hookers.
When not trying to play “kingmaker” in US politics,
Wisconsin-raised and Delaware rich Friess pretends to
to be a cowboy.
On second thought, never mind. Remember what Friess told the Washington Post in a laughable lie in 2010, at the beginning:
“Tucker and Neil present a huge opportunity to re-introduce civility to our political discourse. They are mature, sensible men who are very thoughtful and experienced with pleasant senses of humor and do not take themselves too seriously. They want to make a contribution to the dialogue that occurs in our country that has become too antagonistic, nasty and hostile. . . .
How’s that working out for you, guys?
Courage.
What’s the significance of a politician using or not using a prostitute anyway? Having sex with someone you aren’t married to (something that many many people in society unfortunately do) is basically the same as using a prostitute. It’s just a matter of paying in time (a few dinners and drinks) instead of money, but the moral problem of using someone’s reproductive ability like a meaningless drug still exists in both situations.
There is no significance. It’s just a slimy attempt to destroy a political opponent, funded by a man who claims that “Jesus is my CEO.” I’m sure that, were Jesus here, he’d take exception to the notion.
Damn straight! Matt didn’t grasp the real point.